Ivan Ljubicic vs Jarkko Nieminen Head to Head Stats
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
L L W L L W W L L L
Form
W W L L L L L W W WHead-2-Head: Ljubicic 2 - 0 Nieminen
They have played 5 sets in total, with Ljubicic winning 4 and Nieminen winning 1. The last match between Ljubicic and Nieminen was at the Open Sud de France - Montpellier, 29-10-2010, Quarterfinals, I.hard with Ivan Ljubicic getting the victory 4-6 6-3 7-6(6).
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Ivan Ljubicic | 2 |
| Jarkko Nieminen | 0 |
Open Sud de France - Montpellier(29-10-2010)
4
6
6
3
7
6
| Ljubicic | Stats | Nieminen |
|---|---|---|
| 0% (0-0) | YTD Win/Loss | 0% (0-0) |
| 2 | Head-to-Head | 0 |
| Ret. | Ranking | Ret. |
| 3 | Highest Rank | 13 |
| 46 | Age | 43 |
| R | Plays | L |
| 14 | Titles | 12 |
| 60% (488-330) | Career Total W/L | 58% (574-409) |
| $4,731,485 | Career Prize Money | $3,231,200 |
| 1 | Hard H2H | 0 |
| 1 | Indoor H2H | 0 |
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Sabalenka VS Mertens PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid wta
27 Apr 2025 / Third
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Khachanov VS Paul PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid atp
28 Apr 2025 / Third
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4-6 6-3 7-6(6) |
Stats 
Ivan Ljubicic
Player
Jarkko Nieminen
74%
(
66 of
89)
1st Serve %
77%
(
73 of
95)
24
Aces
10
0
Double Faults
0
82%
(
54 of
66)
1st Serve Won
78%
(
57 of
73)
52%
(
12 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
8 of
22)
17%
(
1 of
6)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
26%
(
23 of
89)
Rtn Points Won
32%
(
30 of
95)
96
Total Points Won
88
|
||||
| 7-6(4) 6-4 |
Stats
Ivan Ljubicic
Player
Jarkko Nieminen
60%
(
44 of
73)
1st Serve %
58%
(
42 of
73)
13
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
1
80%
(
35 of
44)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
26 of
42)
62%
(
18 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
74%
(
23 of
31)
20%
(
1 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
27%
(
20 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
33%
(
24 of
73)
77
Total Points Won
69
|
||||
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2 | H2H Matches | 0 |
| 4 | Sets Won | 1 |
| 30 | Games Won | 25 |
| 37 | Aces (Total) | 11 |
| 1 | Total Double Faults | 1 |
| 0:59:0 | Average Match Time | 0:59:0 |
| 68% (110/162) | 1st Serve % | 68% (115/168) |
| 81% (89/110) | 1st Serve Win % | 72% (83/115) |
| 58% (30/52) | 2nd Serve Win % | 58% (31/53) |
| 18% (2/11) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 33% (1/3) |
| 32% (54/168) | Return Points Win % | 27% (43/162) |
| 100% (2/2) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 0% (0/2) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 100% (2/2) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 0% (0/2) |
| 100% (1/1) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (1/0) |
| 0% (1/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 100% (1/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (1/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Ivan Ljubicic Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Ivan Dodig
Player
Ivan Ljubicic
51%
(
21 of
41)
1st Serve %
40%
(
23 of
58)
1
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
3
81%
(
17 of
21)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
14 of
23)
50%
(
10 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
11 of
35)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
34%
(
14 of
41)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
33 of
58)
60
Total Points Won
39
|
6-0 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Flavio Cipolla
Player
Ivan Ljubicic
80%
(
52 of
65)
1st Serve %
42%
(
26 of
62)
1
Aces
9
1
Double Faults
3
69%
(
36 of
52)
1st Serve Won
77%
(
20 of
26)
54%
(
7 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
14 of
36)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
34%
(
22 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
28 of
62)
71
Total Points Won
56
|
6-2 7-5 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Janko Tipsarevic
Player
Ivan Ljubicic
74%
(
43 of
58)
1st Serve %
60%
(
41 of
68)
9
Aces
15
0
Double Faults
5
70%
(
30 of
43)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
30 of
41)
73%
(
11 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
13 of
27)
25%
(
2 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
29%
(
17 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
25 of
68)
66
Total Points Won
60
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Ivan Ljubicic
Player
Karol Beck
63%
(
44 of
70)
1st Serve %
62%
(
37 of
60)
15
Aces
5
5
Double Faults
1
86%
(
38 of
44)
1st Serve Won
84%
(
31 of
37)
54%
(
14 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
11 of
23)
100%
(
1 of
1)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
26%
(
18 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
30%
(
18 of
60)
70
Total Points Won
60
|
6-4 7-6(1) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Ivan Ljubicic
Player
Florent Serra
63%
(
66 of
105)
1st Serve %
56%
(
49 of
87)
27
Aces
6
3
Double Faults
1
80%
(
53 of
66)
1st Serve Won
80%
(
39 of
49)
49%
(
19 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
19 of
38)
100%
(
2 of
2)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
31%
(
33 of
105)
Rtn Points Won
33%
(
29 of
87)
101
Total Points Won
91
|
6-4 6-7(3) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Jesse Huta Galung
Player
Ivan Ljubicic
56%
(
43 of
77)
1st Serve %
61%
(
41 of
67)
11
Aces
11
2
Double Faults
2
81%
(
35 of
43)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
30 of
41)
53%
(
18 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
14 of
26)
33%
(
2 of
6)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
31%
(
24 of
77)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
23 of
67)
76
Total Points Won
68
|
7-6(6) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Michael Berrer
Player
Ivan Ljubicic
62%
(
32 of
52)
1st Serve %
66%
(
45 of
68)
2
Aces
11
0
Double Faults
2
81%
(
26 of
32)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
32 of
45)
55%
(
11 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
8 of
23)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
29%
(
15 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
28 of
68)
65
Total Points Won
55
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Ivan Ljubicic
Player
Karol Beck
70%
(
72 of
103)
1st Serve %
51%
(
45 of
89)
16
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
3
75%
(
54 of
72)
1st Serve Won
84%
(
38 of
45)
61%
(
19 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
59%
(
26 of
44)
50%
(
1 of
2)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
29%
(
30 of
103)
Rtn Points Won
28%
(
25 of
89)
98
Total Points Won
94
|
7-6(5) 3-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Lukas Lacko
Player
Ivan Ljubicic
64%
(
78 of
122)
1st Serve %
59%
(
80 of
136)
27
Aces
13
4
Double Faults
3
81%
(
63 of
78)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
61 of
80)
64%
(
28 of
44)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
29 of
56)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
25%
(
31 of
122)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
46 of
136)
137
Total Points Won
121
|
3-6 4-6 6-3 6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Florian Mayer
Player
Ivan Ljubicic
61%
(
30 of
49)
1st Serve %
57%
(
28 of
49)
4
Aces
5
3
Double Faults
2
83%
(
25 of
30)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
17 of
28)
42%
(
8 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
24%
(
5 of
21)
100%
(
5 of
5)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
33%
(
16 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
27 of
49)
60
Total Points Won
38
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
view more
Jarkko Nieminen Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Rubber 4 |
Stats
Jarkko Nieminen
Player
Frederik Nielsen
63%
(
88 of
139)
1st Serve %
61%
(
62 of
102)
5
Aces
4
0
Double Faults
9
67%
(
59 of
88)
1st Serve Won
79%
(
49 of
62)
63%
(
32 of
51)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
20 of
40)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
22%
(
2 of
9)
35%
(
48 of
139)
Rtn Points Won
32%
(
33 of
102)
124
Total Points Won
117
|
6-3 3-6 6-1 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
| Rubber 1 |
Stats
Jarkko Nieminen
Player
Mikael Torpegaard
65%
(
64 of
98)
1st Serve %
48%
(
49 of
102)
1
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
11
88%
(
56 of
64)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
37 of
49)
44%
(
15 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
49%
(
26 of
53)
31%
(
4 of
13)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
28%
(
27 of
98)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
39 of
102)
110
Total Points Won
90
|
7-6(1) 7-5 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Rubber 1 |
Stats
Jarkko Nieminen
Player
Courtney John Lock
75%
(
39 of
52)
1st Serve %
72%
(
34 of
47)
5
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
3
77%
(
30 of
39)
1st Serve Won
21%
(
7 of
34)
69%
(
9 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
15%
(
2 of
13)
69%
(
9 of
13)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
25%
(
13 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
81%
(
38 of
47)
77
Total Points Won
22
|
6-0 6-0 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Nicolas Almagro
Player
Jarkko Nieminen
55%
(
49 of
89)
1st Serve %
63%
(
74 of
117)
15
Aces
4
4
Double Faults
0
92%
(
45 of
49)
1st Serve Won
77%
(
57 of
74)
45%
(
18 of
40)
2nd Serve Won
49%
(
21 of
43)
13%
(
1 of
8)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
29%
(
26 of
89)
Rtn Points Won
33%
(
39 of
117)
102
Total Points Won
104
|
3-6 7-6(6) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Mikhail Youzhny
Player
Jarkko Nieminen
62%
(
51 of
82)
1st Serve %
59%
(
43 of
73)
6
Aces
2
7
Double Faults
0
80%
(
41 of
51)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
27 of
43)
45%
(
14 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
60%
(
18 of
30)
22%
(
2 of
9)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
33%
(
27 of
82)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
28 of
73)
83
Total Points Won
72
|
7-6(3) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Tatsuma Ito
Player
Jarkko Nieminen
41%
(
25 of
61)
1st Serve %
56%
(
35 of
63)
5
Aces
2
5
Double Faults
6
88%
(
22 of
25)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
20 of
35)
47%
(
17 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
10 of
28)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
36%
(
22 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
33 of
63)
72
Total Points Won
52
|
6-2 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Jo-Wilfried Tsonga
Player
Jarkko Nieminen
56%
(
39 of
70)
1st Serve %
46%
(
33 of
71)
16
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
2
85%
(
33 of
39)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
21 of
33)
65%
(
20 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
14 of
38)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
24%
(
17 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
36 of
71)
89
Total Points Won
52
|
6-3 6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Tristan Lamasine
Player
Jarkko Nieminen
60%
(
69 of
115)
1st Serve %
57%
(
71 of
124)
7
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
2
78%
(
54 of
69)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
48 of
71)
46%
(
21 of
46)
2nd Serve Won
58%
(
31 of
53)
31%
(
4 of
13)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
35%
(
40 of
115)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
45 of
124)
120
Total Points Won
119
|
5-7 7-6(6) 7-5 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Jarkko Nieminen
Player
Jurgen Zopp
68%
(
70 of
103)
1st Serve %
59%
(
60 of
102)
3
Aces
6
3
Double Faults
3
74%
(
52 of
70)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
44 of
60)
48%
(
16 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
20 of
42)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
34%
(
35 of
103)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
38 of
102)
106
Total Points Won
99
|
4-6 6-3 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Jarkko Nieminen
Player
Anton Pavlov
76%
(
38 of
50)
1st Serve %
66%
(
43 of
65)
1
Aces
4
0
Double Faults
0
79%
(
30 of
38)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
20 of
43)
33%
(
4 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
12 of
22)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
32%
(
16 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
33 of
65)
67
Total Points Won
48
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 60% (488/330) | Win/Loss | 58% (574/409) |
| 57% (1204/903) | Sets Win/Loss | 56% (1408/1109) |
| 52% (11184/10208) | Games Win/Loss | 52% (12634/11470) |
| 61% (177/113) | Hard Win/Loss | 52% (158/143) |
| 56% (126/100) | Clay Win/Loss | 63% (202/120) |
| 63% (158/91) | Indoor Hard W/L | 62% (187/114) |
| 51% (27/26) | Grass Win/Loss | 46% (27/32) |
| 0.4 | Aces Per Game | 0.16 |
| 4209 | Aces Total | 1850 |
| 0.07 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.1 |
| 765 | Total Double Faults | 1180 |
| 1st Match | Average Match Time | 1st Match |
| 462.12 | Average Opponent Rank | 524.36 |
| 59% (16789/28389) | 1st Serve % | 66% (29581/44936) |
| 78% (13021/16789) | 1st Serve Win % | 68% (20221/29561) |
| 51% (5935/11604) | 2nd Serve Win % | 50% (7706/15364) |
| 37% (798/2171) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 42% (1744/4112) |
| 35% (9930/28328) | Return Points Win % | 38% (16915/44087) |
| 50% (48/48) | Slam W/L | 53% (59/53) |
| 59% (132/92) | Masters W/L | 47% (75/85) |
| 62% (21/13) | Cups W/L | 81% (42/10) |
| 62% (246/149) | Main Tour W/L | 56% (270/211) |
| 33% (2/4) | Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 61% (35/22) | Challenger W/L | 73% (126/47) |
| 0% (0/0) | Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 62% (417/677) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 58% (475/820) |
| 52% (69/132) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 60% (93/155) |
| 52% (247/473) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 54% (198/364) |
| 58% (162/278) | Deciding Set Win % | 56% (185/330) |
| 84% (485/408) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 84% (559/472) |
| 15% (485/74) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 15% (559/86) |
| 24% (332/80) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 23% (424/99) |
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
